When Personal Injuries Result in Death: Wrongful Death Cases

Wrongful death claims allege, as their basis, that the deceased died as a result of the negligence or liability of another. The deceased’s surviving relatives, dependents, or beneficiaries may bring suit against those claimed to have been responsible, seeking monetary damages to compensate for the losses. Each state has its own statute covering claims for wrongful death, and not every state follows the same guidelines, principles, or rules. A personal injury attorney in your state can advise you on whether you have a valid wrongful death claim and can help you pursue that claim to the best possible outcome.

Laws on Wrongful Death Resulting from Personal Injuries Vary from State to State

Some states have “true” wrongful death acts in which the next of kin are entitled to bring a cause of action in their own names as a result of damages sustained following the decedent’s death. Other states have acts that are more properly called “survival acts,” which preserve the rights that vested in the decedent at the moment of death, expand those rights to include the right of the survivors to bring a claim based on the decedent’s rights, and include claims for damages resulting from the actual death itself. Finally, some states recognize both types of lawsuits, but generally have a provision that limits the right of the survivors in order to prevent a double recovery under the two different theories.

Which individuals are entitled to bring a wrongful death claim also depends on the jurisdiction. Generally, the primary beneficiaries of the individual-often the spouse and children-are able to bring a claim, and in some states the parents of the deceased may be also designated as beneficiaries. In most states, if the deceased did not leave behind any spouse, children, or parents, there is no one who may bring a wrongful death claim, unless the scope of the state’s wrongful death act has been expanded to include other persons who were dependent on the deceased. Sometimes, the recovery, if any, is simply doled out to the deceased’s heirs at law or is distributed to the beneficiaries of the estate, as it would be in any normal probate proceeding.

In most jurisdictions, in order to be legally liable, it is not necessary that the defendant’s conduct be the sole cause of the death. Even when the defendant’s negligence contributes in part, or in tandem with other circumstances, to the decedent’s death, liability may still attach. Generally, a wrongful death cause of action can arise out of any tort theory, including an intentional tort, reckless or negligent behavior, or strict liability.

When a defendant is found legally liable for the death of another, the types of damages that may be recovered can also vary greatly. For example, the plaintiffs may be able to recover the costs of the deceased’s medical care and treatment related to the negligent conduct, the funeral expenses incurred for the deceased’s burial, the loss of future earnings of the deceased, the value of the loss of the deceased’s benefits (such as pension benefits or medical and health insurance coverage), the value of the loss of consortium, and general damages. Additionally, in a few states, the plaintiffs may be able to recover damages for pain and suffering or mental anguish that they experienced as a result of the death, as well as punitive damages.

Wrongful Death Cases

The method and manner of calculating damages in a wrongful death action can be very complex. This potential complexity is especially true when trying to calculate the pecuniary loss to which the plaintiffs are entitled. Pecuniary loss generally includes the survivor’s loss of support, contributions, and services due to the decedent’s death. The bases for computing these damages are the decedent’s life expectancy and work life expectancy. The life expectancy of the beneficiaries and, where necessary, the remaining period of minority of any beneficiaries must be considered. In calculating the value of the survivors’ future loss, not only may the wages of the decedent be considered but the court may also consider the value of past contributions made by the decedent, the decedent’s familial concern, his personal habits, and his spending behavior.

In cases where there is more than one beneficiary, the damages recovered will be distributed among those beneficiaries. Most states allocate the damages among the beneficiaries in accordance with their losses. However, in some states the recovery is divided as spelled out in statute, and in others divided according to normal intestacy laws within the state.

A defendant is entitled, in general, to raise any defenses in a wrongful death action that could have been raised in an action brought directly by the decedent, had he or she not died. Therefore, if the decedent was contributorily negligent in causing his or her own death, the defendant may assert that defense in the wrongful death action. Also, in most states, if the decedent had already recovered damages, such as in a case where the death was not immediate and the decedent was able to bring his own successful cause of action, the survivors may not then successfully bring a wrongful death action and recover, in essence again, for the same injury. There are limitations to this prohibition and in some situations, the survivors may be entitled to commence and maintain a claim.

Slips and Falls

Slips, Falls, & Other Premises-related Personal Injuries

Premises liability law involves the legal responsibility of owners and occupiers of property for injuries suffered by persons on the property. One of the most common causes of such injuries is a trip or slip and fall, such as on an icy sidewalk, a loose or uneven stair tread, or a piece of debris or spilled liquid on the floor. The actual liability of the responsible individuals varies depending on the rules and principles adopted in the jurisdiction where the mishap occurred. An experienced premises liability lawyer can determine whether liability may exist in a particular case and help an injured person recover damages for lost wages, medical bills, and pain and suffering.

General Premises Liability Principles in Personal Injury Cases

Some states’ premises liability laws focus on the status of the visitor to the property. In such states, the plaintiff is generally defined as either an invitee, a licensee, or a trespasser. An invitee is someone who is expressly or impliedly invited onto the property of another. The owner owes the invitee the highest duty of care, which includes taking every reasonable precaution to ensure the invitee’s safety. A licensee, by contrast, enters the property for his or her own purposes but is present at the consent of the owner. The owner is required to warn a licensee of hidden dangers, but is not necessarily required to fix them. And finally, a trespasser enters without any right whatsoever to do so. In the case of adult trespassers, the owner has no duty of care and need not take reasonable care of his property or warn of hidden dangers.

Even if the plaintiff is a trespasser, he or she may still be able to recover, however, if the plaintiff can show that the owner knew it was likely that trespassers would enter the property. And children are owed a higher duty of care, regardless of whether they are considered trespassers. A landowner’s duty to warn is also heightened with respect to children.

In states where consideration is given to the condition of the property and the activities of the owner and visitor, a uniform standard of care is applied to both invitees and licensees. This uniform standard requires the exercise of reasonable care for the safety of visitors other than trespassers. In order to satisfy the reasonableness standard owed to invitees and licensees, an owner has a continuing duty to inspect the property, identify dangerous conditions, and either repair them or post warnings as appropriate.

In proving a premises liability case, a plaintiff must show that the standard of reasonableness required by an owner has not been met. Perhaps the highest hurdle that a plaintiff must overcome relates to the owner’s knowledge. The plaintiff must prove that the owner had or should have had knowledge of the condition in order for liability to attach, which is often quite often difficult to establish.

One of the commonly applied theories to limit a plaintiff’s recovery is comparative or contributory fault. A visitor has a duty, in most cases, to exercise reasonable care for his or her own safety, and when that degree of care is not exercised, the plaintiff’s recovery may be limited or reduced by an amount attributable to his or her own negligence.

Slips

Slip & Fall Personal Injury Cases

Slip and fall injuries are, as the name implies, injuries that occur when a person slips, usually on a foreign substance or as a result of a dangerous condition, and falls. A common slip and fall case occurs when someone slips on an icy sidewalk in front of a business, or a customer in a grocery store slips on a grape, lettuce leaf, or other food item that has fallen on the floor and been overlooked by the proprietor.

The premises owner may or may not be liable for the plaintiff’s injuries in these common scenarios. Although owners and possessors of real property have a duty to exercise reasonable care to maintain the premises to protect lawful visitors, if a condition of the premises is noticed by a customer or other visitor or should be readily apparent, the property owner may avoid liability because the plaintiff has a duty to protect himself or herself against the injury. The property owner may also avoid liability by establishing that the debris had so recently fallen on the floor or that the ice had so recently accumulated that the responsible persons had no reasonable opportunity to correct the condition and avoid the hazard before the plaintiff fell. In other words, the plaintiff in a slip and fall case, whether it occurs in a grocery store or elsewhere, must show that the owner had a reasonable period of time in which to discover the dangerous condition and in which to remedy it. The determination of what constitutes a reasonable time will vary from case to case.

Catastrophic Injury

Wichita Falls Catastrophic Injury Lawyers

Texas Spinal Cord Injury Attorneys

A catastrophic injury such as damage to the brain or spinal cord, back injury, severe burns or paralysis can require years of expensive grueling therapy, and strain the patience of even the most loving of families.

If you or someone close to you has suffered a catastrophic injury in an accident caused by someone else, you can benefit from the help of attorneys who view the legal profession as a helping profession; a different kind of law firm that works for a better world; a group of lawyers dedicated to your physical and financial health, and a brighter future.

You should speak with our Banner, Briley & White law firm in Wichita Falls — serving the legal needs of victims of catastrophic injury in the north Texas region.

Chronic pain, traumatic brain injuries, permanent scarring, the loss of a limb: These are life-changing setbacks that can affect the personal and professional life of the victim, and place a tremendous burden of care on a family. Banner, Briley & White personal injury attorneys investigate the cause of your accident, identify the negligent party, and bring the facts of your case to his or her insurer for negotiations on a settlement, or litigation in a courtroom if necessary.

Our commitment to insuring justice for all of our clients is strong and continuing. For a free initial consultation to discuss your catastrophic injury accident, contact us by toll-free phone call to 866-492-9554.

Banner, Briley & White: Aggressive Representation for Catastrophic Injury Victims

Catastrophic injury can occur when negligence causes:

Catastrophic Injury

  • Car accidents
  • Truck accidents
  • Motorcycle accidents
  • Collisions between small cars and large commercial vehicles
  • Distracted driver accidents
  • Malfunctioning or deffective products
  • Property accidents
  • Pedestrian and bicycle accidents
  • Drunk driving accidents
  • Workplace accidents
  • Industrial accidents
  • Hit-and-run accidents
  • Recreational accidents
  • Transportation accidents
  • Nursing home abuse and neglect
  • Medical malpractice

We offer maximum availability to our legal expertise from start to finish of your journey through the legal process. We answer your questions and concerns honestly and directly. We deal with spontaneous issues promptly and professionally. We provide realistic assessments of your case’s chances for success. We want our representation to be a source of comfort for you as you transition to a life of recovery and renewal.

At Banner, Briley & White, we deliver our quality legal services on a contingency fee basis. You owe no attorney fee unless we win your case, and a settlement damage award that you approve.